Listening Strategies and Processes during Paired Listening among Pre-University ESL Learners:
A Qualitative Case Study
Abstract
In many Malaysian ESL classrooms, listening instruction remains dominated by conventional, product- and individual-oriented approaches that limit listening strategy development through peer support and process-oriented engagement. This qualitative pilot study investigates listening strategies and processes during paired listening instruction among two pre-university ESL learners. Grounded in sociocultural learning theory and Vandergrift’s Metacognitive Pedagogical Sequence instruction, paired listening instruction integrated collaboration throughout pre-, while-, and post-listening stages. Following three practice sessions (360 minutes), one paired listening task was video-recorded and verbal interactions were analysed using deductive-inductive content analysis. Findings reveal that learners employed metacognitive strategies (70%) more than cognitive strategies (30%), with monitoring dominating (92%) metacognitive strategy use. Cognitive strategies like information recall and elaboration consistently supported metacognitive processes. Eight metacognitive subcategories emerged from verbal protocols: directing attention, initiating comprehension checks, verifying understanding, judging comprehension, acknowledging gaps, identifying difficulty sources, negotiating understanding modifications, and monitoring task progress. Paired interaction enabled peer scaffolding where partners prompted metacognitive reflection and provided external support for comprehension construction. The study demonstrates that paired listening makes covert cognitive processes observable through obligatory verbalisation, offering methodological advantages for accessing listening processes. Despite its limitations (small sample size, short duration, single task), the findings suggest that paired listening provides a viable process-based alternative to product-oriented approaches in Malaysian ESL contexts, with implications for large mixed-proficiency classrooms where peer support may compensate for limited teacher attention.
Copyright (c) 2026 Gading Journal for the Social Sciences (e-ISSN 2600-7568)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.