Evaluating Outcomes-Based Education and Student-Centred Learning through Continuous Quality Improvement:

Comparative Cohort Study in Undergraduate Physics Education

Authors

  • Nurmalessa Muhammad Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor
  • Hedzlin Zainuddin Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor
  • Ainnur-Sherene Kamisan Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor

Keywords:

continuous quality improvement, curriculum alignment, higher education Malaysia, physics education, student-centred learning

Abstract

This study presents Course Delivery Learning Continuous Quality Improvement (CDL-CQI) data from four Photovoltaic Energy Systems (PHY555) cohorts (2022–2025) at Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Shah Alam to evaluate the longitudinal implementation of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) and Student-Centred Learning (SCL) at the course level. Academic performance indicators, student perception measures, and structured lecturer self-evaluations were analysed to examine how pedagogical practice, student learning behaviours, and curriculum alignment influence learning outcomes in a STEM context. While OBE–SCL frameworks are widely implemented, variations in cohort performance remain insufficiently explained. Using CDL-CQI data, this study identifies how differences in student learning behaviour and curriculum alignment contribute to these variations. Results indicate that higher-performing cohorts demonstrate stronger engagement and perception gains, while persistent weaknesses in CO–PO–LO–KI alignment constrain outcome consistency. This study contributes by demonstrating that CQI data can uncover hidden learner-related and alignment issues within otherwise compliant OBE–SCL systems, providing a practical framework for improving consistency and equity in STEM education. This study is novel in its use of CDL-CQI data to diagnose cohort-level disparities within a fully implemented OBE–SCL system.

References

Amir, R., & Jelas, Z. M. (2010). Teaching and learning styles in higher education institutions: Do they match? Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.092

Bandura, A. (Ed.). (1997). Self-efficacy in changing societies. Cambridge university press

Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871

Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University Assessing for learning quality: II. Practic. In Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Open University Press.

Biggs, J. B., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education (UK) / Open University Press.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillside. In NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Garrison, D. R. (1997). Self-directed learning: Toward a comprehensive model. Adult education quarterly, 48(1), 18-33.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1). https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Harden, R. M. (2007). Outcome-based education: the future is today. Medical teacher, 29(7), 625-629.

Hussain Saeedi, K. (2024). Exploring the Effectiveness of Outcome-Based Education and Student-Centred Learning in Advancing Sustainability in Higher Education. Conference on Higher Education and Sustainable Development, (Volume I), pp. 240-248. ISBN 978-93-95944-56-4.

Jaiswal, P. (2019). Using Constructive Alignment to Foster Teaching Learning Processes. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 10. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n6p10

Karatas, K., & Arpaci, I. (2021). The role of self-directed learning, metacognition, and 21st century skills predicting the readiness for online learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10786

Loyens, S. M., Magda, J., & Rikers, R. M. (2008). Self-directed learning in problem-based learning and its relationships with self-regulated learning. Educational psychology review, 20(4), 411-427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7

Malaysian Qualification Agency. (2011). Programme standards : Engineering and Engineering Technology = Standard Program : Kejuruteraan dan Teknologi Kejuruteraan. Agensi Kelayakan Malaysia.

Malaysian Qualifications Agency. (2017). MALAYSIAN QUALIFICATIONS FRAMEWORK (MQF) SECOND EDITION (2024). Second Edition.

Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33.

Richardson, M., Abraham, C., & Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 138(2), 353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026838

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary educational psychology, 60, 101832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832

Sharkey, S., & Weimer, M. (2003). Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice. Teaching Sociology, 31(2) 251. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211318

Tight, M. (2004). Research into higher education: An a-theoretical community of practice? Higher Education Research and Development, 23(4). 395-411. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436042000276431

Yusof, R., Othman, N., Norwani, N. M., Ahmad, N. L. B., & Jalil, N. B. A. (2017). Implementation of outcome-based education (OBE) in accounting programme in higher education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 1186-1200. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i6/3352

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(2), 64-70.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-19

How to Cite

Muhammad, N., Zainuddin, H. ., & Kamisan, A.-S. (2026). Evaluating Outcomes-Based Education and Student-Centred Learning through Continuous Quality Improvement: : Comparative Cohort Study in Undergraduate Physics Education. Gading Journal for the Social Sciences (e-ISSN 2600-7568), 29(2), 279–292. Retrieved from https://gadingssuitm.com/index.php/gadingss/article/view/820

Issue

Vol. 29 No. 2 (2026): Gading Journal for the Social Sciences

Section

Article/Paper

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Gading Journal for the Social Sciences (e-ISSN 2600-7568)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

License Terms

All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Full license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/