AP_Lab:

A Digitally Enabled Practical Assessment for Laboratory-based Practical Assessment in Engineering Education

Authors

  • Zadariana Jamil Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam, Selangor
  • Noraida Mohd Saim Universiti Teknologi MARA Shah Alam, Selangor
  • Zulhafizal Othman Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pahang
  • Farah Wahida Mohd Latib Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Pahang
  • Mohd Fairuz Bachok Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Johor

Keywords:

e-assessment, student assessment, remote laboratory applications in engineering, digital education, educational technology

Abstract

In laboratory courses, students' practical performance must be evaluated systematically, and records must be kept reliably, clearly, and easily accessible. This study introduces the AP_Lab system, engineered with methodologies for conducting online practical assessments and providing a storage platform to facilitate laboratory instruction and evaluation. The system combines all course requirements, including the syllabus, lab manual, assessment rubrics, Bloom's taxonomy alignment, and standard operating procedure (SOP) compliance. The AP_Lab system has several connected interfaces for entering data, recording assessments, and tracing them back. Two test-run sessions were held to evaluate the system adequacy, the usability of the user interface and the functional integrity of the navigation links. The insights gained during the test runs were considered to further improve system functionality and design. The first test run included a group of teachers who had taught in a lab to ensure that the assessment workflow was both useful and appropriate. The AP_Lab system enabled rubric-centered assessment of individual procedural performance and group teamwork behaviour, while allowing assessors to replay video evidence and store all marks, comments and evidence links in a single retrievable record. These strengthen assessment traceability and reduce reliance on fragmented paper-based marking. User evaluation indicated high acceptance among students (n = 30) and lecturers (n = 10), with excellent reliability (Cronbach’s  = 0.92 overall) and high mean satisfaction (4.21  0.5). Although lecturers rated the system slightly higher than students, the difference was not statistically significant.

References

Al-Khatib, M., Alkhatib, A., Talhami, M., Kashem, A. H. M., Ayari, M. A., & Choe, P. (2024). Enhancing engineering students’ satisfaction with online learning: factors, framework, and strategies. Frontiers in Education, 9(September), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1445885

Azanza, G., Korres, O., Paños-Castro, J., & Petchamé, J. (2024). Empowering University Lecturers in the Digital Age: Exploring the Factors Influencing the Use of Digital Technologies in Higher Education. Education Sciences, 14(7), 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070728

Bolong, N., Saad, I., & Zakaria, S. N. F. (2025). Assessing the Impact of the Non-Physical Laboratory Approach on Open-Ended Environmental Laboratory Practice. Asean Journal of Engineering Education, 9(2), 81–87. https://doi.org/10.11113/ajee2025.9n2.164

Derahman, A., Mat Yusof, N., & Hamzah, N. (2024). Analytic Rubrics for the Practical Assessment of Students’ Performances in Engineering Survey Course. Journal of Sustainable Civil Engineering and Technology, 3(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24191/jscet.v3i2.1-10

Eldridge, S. M., Lancaster, G. A., Campbell, M. J., Thabane, L., Hopewell, S., Coleman, C. L., & Bond, C. M. (2016). Defining feasibility and pilot studies in preparation for randomised controlled trials: Development of a conceptual framework. PLoS ONE, 11(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150205

Heil, J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2023). Online Assessment in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Online Learning Journal, 27(1), 187–218. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i1.3398

Kurtz, M., Benabbou, A., Pons, C., & Broisin, J. (2025). Collaboration in virtual and remote laboratories for education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 20(4), 549-603 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-025-09454-7

Li, J., & Liang, W. (2024). Effectiveness of virtual laboratory in engineering education: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 19(12), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316269

May, D., Jahnke, I., & Moore, S. (2023). Online laboratories and virtual experimentation in higher education from a sociotechnical-pedagogical design perspective. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 35(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-023-09380-3

Nandhitha, N. M., & Roslin, S. E. (2024). OBE Framework for Assessing Laboratory / Practical Courses in Engineering Programmes. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 37(3), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.16920/jeet/2024/v37i3/24008

Nikolic, S., Suesse, T. F., Grundy, S., Haque, R., Lyden, S., Hassan, G. M., Daniel, S., Belkina, M., & Lal, S. (2023). Laboratory learning objectives: ranking objectives across the cognitive, psychomotor and affective domains within engineering. European Journal of Engineering Education, 49(3), 454–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2248042

Nikolic, S., Suesse, T. F., Grundy, S., Haque, R., Lyden, S., Lal, S., Hassan, G. M., Daniel, S., & Belkina, M. (2025). Assessment integrity and validity in the teaching laboratory: adapting to GenAI by developing an understanding of the verifiable learning objectives behind laboratory assessment selection. European Journal of Engineering Education, 50(4), 673–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2025.2456944

Pérez-Guillén, S., Carrasco-Uribarren, A., Celis, C. L. de, González-Rueda, V., Rodríguez-Rubio, P. R., & Cabanillas-Barea, S. (2022). Students’ perceptions, engagement and satisfaction with the use of an e-rubric for the assessment of manual skills in physiotherapy. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03651-w

Roberts, C., Jorm, C., Nisbet, G., Gordon, C. J., Chen, T., Held, F., & Haq, I. (2024). Video-based peer assessment of collaborative teamwork in a large-scale interprofessional learning activity. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1307. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06124-4

Syamala, S., Shrivastava, A., & Karmakar, S. (2025). Identifying interface design factors impacting user experience in digital learning platforms- A pilot study. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 11, 101662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101662

Sembey, R., Hoda, R., & Grundy, J. (2024). Emerging technologies in higher education assessment and feedback practices: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 211(November 2023), 111988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2024.111988

Wahyudi, M. N. A., Budiyanto, C. W., Widiastuti, I., Hatta, P., & Bakar, M. S. Bin. (2024). Understanding Virtual Laboratories in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 7(2), 102. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v7i2.85271

Downloads

Published

2026-08-15

How to Cite

Jamil, Z., Mohd Saim, N. ., Othman, Z., Mohd Latib, F. W., & Bachok, M. F. . (2026). AP_Lab: : A Digitally Enabled Practical Assessment for Laboratory-based Practical Assessment in Engineering Education. Gading Journal for the Social Sciences (e-ISSN 2600-7568), 29(2), 156–169. Retrieved from https://gadingssuitm.com/index.php/gadingss/article/view/839