Content Validity and Reliability of the Emotional Intelligence and Self-Efficacy (EISE) Instrument for TESL Teacher Education

Authors

  • Norfitriana Yunus Kolej Vokasional Kuala Klawang, Negeri Sembilan
  • Nor Tutiani Ab Wahid Universiti Teknologi MARA Selangor

Keywords:

validity, reliability, emotional intelligence, self-efficacy

Abstract

Emotional Intelligence (EI) and Self-Efficacy (SE) are critical factors in achieving academic success, with research indicating that EI can influence levels of SE. These constructs are particularly relevant in enhancing graduate employability, especially for future educators. This study aims to determine the content validity and reliability of the Emotional Intelligence and Self-Efficacy (EISE) instrument in relation to students’ academic performance. Content validity was assessed by three expert evaluators, while reliability was tested through a pilot study involving 50 TESL students from the Faculty of Education of Universiti Teknologi MARA, Puncak Alam. The EISE instrument includes three constructs: Emotional Intelligence, Self-Efficacy, and Open-Ended Questions. Results showed a content validity index (CVI) of 1.00 for both EI and SE, with all open-ended items accepted by the expert panels. The findings suggest that the EISE instrument is both valid and reliable and holds strong potential as a tool for preparing and assessing future educators. It is recommended for implementation in education faculties and can serve as a foundation for future research on the EI-SE relationship.

References

Arthur, F., Okyere-Dankwa, B. Y., Owusu, D., & Nortey, S. A. (2025). Economics teachers’ emotional intelligence and self-efficacy: A moderated mediation model using PLS-SEM. Brain and Behavior, 15(9), e70832. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.70832

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Chang, Y.-C., & Tsai, Y.-T. (2022). The effect of university students’ emotional intelligence, learning motivation and self-efficacy on their academic achievement—Online English courses. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 818929. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.818929

Fackler, S., Sammons, P., & Malmberg, L.-E. (2021). A comparative analysis of predictors of teacher self-efficacy in student engagement, instruction and classroom management in Nordic, Anglo-Saxon and East and South-East Asian countries. Review of Education, 9(1), 203–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3242

Gilar-Corbi, R., Perez-Soto, N., Izquierdo, A., Castejón, J.-L., & Pozo-Rico, T. (2024). Emotional factors and self-efficacy in the psychological well-being of trainee teachers. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1434250. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1434250

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. Bantam Books.

Kalkbrenner, M. T. (2024). Choosing between Cronbach’s coefficient alpha, McDonald’s coefficient omega, and coefficient H: Confidence intervals and the advantages and drawbacks of interpretive guidelines. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 57(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2023.2283637

Kyriazopoulou, M., Metsäpelto, R.-L., Varis, S., Poikkeus, A.-M., Tolvanen, A., Galanaki, E. P., & Lerkkanen, M.-K. (2025). Teacher education students’ emotional intelligence and teacher self-efficacy: A cross-cultural comparison. Current Psychology, 44(2), 1206–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06999-y

Malkewitz, C., Schwall, P., Meesters, C., & von der Hardt, J. (2023). Estimating reliability: A comparison of Cronbach’s α, McDonald’s ωt and the greatest lower bound. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 7(1), 100368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2022.100368

Mamat, N. H. @ Muhammad, N. H., & Ismail, N. A. H. (2021). Integration of emotional intelligence in teaching practice among university teachers in higher education. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 18(2), 69–102.

Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., & Caruso, D. R. (2004). Emotional intelligence: Theory, findings, and implications. Psychological Inquiry, 15(3), 197–215. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli1503_01

OpenAI. (2026). ChatGPT (GPT-5.6 Luna) [Large language model]. https://chatgpt.com/

Rahman, M. H., Amin, M. B., Yusof, M. F., Islam, M. A., & Afrin, S. (2024). Influence of teachers’ emotional intelligence on students’ motivation for academic learning: An empirical study on university students of Bangladesh. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2327752. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2327752

Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Hall, L. E., Haggerty, D. J., Cooper, J. T., Golden, C. J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25(2), 167–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00001-4

Su, H., Wang, C., & Lee, Y. (2022). The relationship between teachers’ emotional intelligence and instructional performance: The mediating role of work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 950597. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.950597

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1

Voulgaraki, E., Kaprinis, S., & Antonopoulou, P. (2023). The influence of emotional intelligence on physical education teachers’ self-efficacy for the inclusion of students with disabilities. European Journal of Special Education Research, 9(1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v9i1.4756

Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Zhao, X., & Li, J. (2022). Exploring the relationship among teacher emotional intelligence, work engagement, teacher self-efficacy, and student academic achievement: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 932560. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.932560

Wang, Y., Derakhshan, A., & Pan, Z. (2022). The interrelationship between emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, and burnout among foreign language teachers: A meta-analytic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 913638. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.913638

Downloads

Published

2026-10-18

How to Cite

Yunus, N., & Ab Wahid, N. T. (2026). Content Validity and Reliability of the Emotional Intelligence and Self-Efficacy (EISE) Instrument for TESL Teacher Education. Gading Journal for the Social Sciences (e-ISSN 2600-7568), 29(2), 335–345. Retrieved from https://gadingssuitm.com/index.php/gadingss/article/view/901

Issue

Vol. 29 No. 2 (2026): Gading Journal for the Social Sciences

Section

Article/Paper

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Gading Journal for the Social Sciences (e-ISSN 2600-7568)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

License Terms

All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Full license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/