AI-Assisted Language Performance and Language Development:
A Conceptual Distinction for Generative AI-Mediated Language Education
Keywords:
generative artificial intelligence, language education, language development, AI literacyAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has become increasingly common in education, particularly after the introduction of ChatGPT and similar systems. In language education, the development is more apparent because language is both the means of interaction with GenAI and the subject that the learners are trying to develop. The main argument of this paper is that better AI-assisted language performance should not automatically be taken as evidence of language development. Learners can use GenAI to obtain explanations, practise conversations, translate, revise writing and receive immediate feedback. Teachers may also use it to prepare lessons, develop materials and support classroom activities. However, the use of GenAI also raises a basic issue in language learning. A learner may be able to produce a better text or a more accurate response with AI assistance, but this does not necessarily mean that an equivalent level of language development has taken place. Thus, this paper intends to look at the relationship between AI, teachers, learners and language development. It discusses the movement from digital education to AI-mediated education, the changing role of teachers and the importance of AI literacy and professional judgement. The paper also looks at the use of AI in language input, interaction, writing, feedback and multilingual practices. Several issues are discussed, including dependency, authorship, assessment, accuracy, access and teacher deskilling. This is a conceptual paper. The discussion draws selectively on recent peer-reviewed studies and major institutional reports, mainly from 2023 to 2026, chosen for their direct relevance to GenAI in language education, teacher practice, learner use, feedback, assessment and language development. Based on the discussion, a conceptual lens is suggested where teacher judgement, learner agency, AI mediation and institutional conditions are considered together. The paper argues that AI can support language learning, but the value of that support should be judged from what learners are eventually able to do with the language, not only from the quality of an AI-assisted product. Its main contribution is to make the difference between assisted performance and language development more explicit in discussions of GenAI and language education.
References
Al-khresheh, M. H. (2024). Bridging technology and pedagogy from a global lens: Teachers’ perspectives on integrating ChatGPT in English language teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100218. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100218
Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
Chapelle, C. A. (2025). Generative AI as game changer: Implications for language education. System, 132, 103672. doi:10.1016/j.system.2025.103672
Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2026). AI for applied linguistics: Repositioning applied linguistics within an AI-mediated paradigm. The Modern Language Journal, 110(3), 941–946. doi:10.1111/modl.70084
Jeon, J., Wei, L., Tai, K. W. H., & Lee, S. (2025). Generative AI and its dilemmas: Exploring AI from a translanguaging perspective. Applied Linguistics, 46(4), 709–717. doi:10.1093/applin/amaf049
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. doi:10.1177/00336882231162868
Li, B., Lowell, V. L., Wang, C., & Li, X. (2024). A systematic review of the first year of publications on ChatGPT and language education: Examining research on ChatGPT’s use in language learning and teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100266. doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100266
Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. doi:10.3390/educsci13040410
Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11, Article 9. doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. doi:10.54675/ZJTE2084
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. doi:10.54675/EWZM9535
Moorhouse, B. L., Wan, Y., Wu, C., Kohnke, L., Ho, T. Y., & Kwong, T. (2024). Developing language teachers’ professional generative AI competence: An intervention study in an initial language teacher education course. System, 125, 103399. doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103399
Moorhouse, B. L., Yeo, M. A., & Wan, Y. (2023). Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking universities. Computers and Education Open, 5, 100151. doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151
OECD. (2025). Results from TALIS 2024: The state of teaching. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/90df6235-en
OECD. (2026). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2026: Exploring effective uses of generative AI in education. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/062a7394-en
Sok, S., & Shin, H. W. (2025). Do interactions with ChatGPT influence L2 learners’ oral speaking ability, summarization ability, and perceptions of generative AI tasks? TESOL Quarterly, 59(S1), S19–S51. doi:10.1002/tesq.70001
Sperling, K., Stenberg, C.-J., McGrath, C., Åkerfeldt, A., Heintz, F., & Stenliden, L. (2024). In search of artificial intelligence (AI) literacy in teacher education: A scoping review. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100169. doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100169
Xia, Q., Weng, X., Ouyang, F., Lin, T. J., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2024). A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence transforms assessment in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), Article 40. doi:10.1186/s41239-024-00468-z
Yang, L., & Li, R. (2024). ChatGPT for L2 learning: Current status and implications. System, 124, 103351. doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103351
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Gading Journal for the Social Sciences (e-ISSN 2600-7568)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
License Terms
All articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial–ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). Full license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
